Where's Waldo? (or at least, where is Christine Quinn)?

We noticed this a while back. Political hacks and wannabees put out media advisories of their public schedules to alert the press and get media coverage of whatever they want to say that day.

So if you want to see Christine Quinn or Michael Bloomberg or Chucky Schumer live and engaging in their ubiquitous pandering, you can get on a press list or get access to publications like the AP Daybook that lists the political events of the day.

City & State, a publication by former mayoral wannabee Tom Allon, also has a political schedule in its daily email, but it seems to be somewhat massaged and filtered for the general public.

If you've ever noticed how newspapers have complete stories ready to go while an event is still happening, or about to happen, it's because politicians will give the information to the press early allowing them to write the stories as long as they are not published until the time specified by the political office.

Thus, the use of "embargoing" a press release. You may get the release one day, but ethically a reporter is not supposed to publish the story until the time specified by the campaign office.

The use of embargoing device happens occasionally, but it seems that Christine Quinn is using it for almost all of her campaign appearances. If for no other reason, Quinn is trying to avoid having to contend with the protesters (the sane ones and the insane ones -- there are both) that show up at her appearances.

According to The Politicker's article, Quinn's campaign office sends out all of her press releases with the caveat "NOT FOR PRINT OR BROADCAST” and “ALL ITEMS EMBARGOED UNTIL DATE AND TIME OF EVENT."

None of the other mayoral candidates have put such restrictions in place. Quinn claims this is "standard practice," but political observers know that's bullshit.

Bill Thompson's campaign stated, "Our schedule is public, because Bill believes that when you’re asking for public trust and support you need to be accessible to the public, to answer their questions and hear their concerns," and "Personally, I can’t understand why any candidate for Mayor would want to hide from the public, but I can’t explain the strategy of the Quinn campaign."

What strategy? To hunker down in secrecy while her constituents - many of whom have been betrayed by her actions over the last 14 years - object to her candidacy? That's what Nixon did.

The Sal Albanese campaign went further. “That’s a poor reflection of what kind of mayor she’d be, transparency is an important quality in a mayor,” said Todd Brogan, a spokesman for former Councilman Sal Albanese. “It doesn’t reflect well on Christine Quinn that she wants to keep the public from knowing what she’s doing.”

If nothing else, this is more evidence of Christine C. Quinn's lack of character.

For more, see after the jump.

Critics Question Christine Quinn’s Embargoed Campaign Schedules
The Politicker
by Ross Barkan
April 25,2013

Christine Quinn’s mayoral campaign scheduling arrives with a caveat that her rivals rarely, if ever, employ: “NOT FOR PRINT OR BROADCAST” and “ALL ITEMS EMBARGOED UNTIL DATE AND TIME OF EVENT.”

Beginning with her bid’s launch last month, the Quinn campaign has told reporters they cannot reveal Ms. Quinn’s whereabouts until the event she is attending is underway. In contrast, all but one of Ms. Quinn’s competitors have no stipulations whatsoever, oftentimes simply stating “Media Advisory” or “For Immediate Release.” Only Public Advocate Bill de Blasio’s campaign says, “For Planning Purposes Only,” but there is no specific order to avoid publishing the details.

But Ms. Quinn’s spokesman Mike Morey insisted the “embargoed” directive was “standard practice.”

“It’s a template that we use on the public schedule,” he said, noting that her appearances at many public forums are reported elsewhere anyway, including yesterday’s. “In any campaign, there are times in which you embargo a news event that you plan to hold that day. But in this case, obviously this was a public event.”

Mr. de Blasio’s campaign declined to comment, but Jonathan Prince, the campaign manager for another contender, former Comptroller Bill Thompson, said he couldn’t understand why Ms. Quinn wouldn’t inform the public of her whereabouts beforehand.

“Our schedule is public, because Bill believes that when you’re asking for public trust and support you need to be accessible to the public, to answer their questions and hear their concerns,” Mr. Prince said in a statement. “Personally, I can’t understand why any candidate for Mayor would want to hide from the public, but I can’t explain the strategy of the Quinn campaign.”

Another campaign was much harsher.

“That’s a poor reflection of what kind of mayor she’d be, transparency is an important quality in a mayor,” said Todd Brogan, a spokesman for former Councilman Sal Albanese. “It doesn’t reflect well on Christine Quinn that she wants to keep the public from knowing what she’s doing.”

Some operatives speculated the schedule strategy was to help Ms. Quinn avoid the clusters of dedicated protesters that seem to shadow her at many events, something Mr. Morey said was not the case. But one leading Quinn gadfly, documentary filmmaker Donny Moss, believes otherwise.

“Of course Quinn wants to keep her schedule private. She doesn’t want to have to explain why she’s greeted by protesters day after day,” he explained. “Our presence reflects poorly on Quinn, and it begs the question among the thousands of people who pass us, ‘What has Quinn done to stir up so much anger that people have taken to the streets to protest her?’”

Mr. Moss added, “We’ve watched her and her entourage navigate around piles of garbage to avoid passing by us.”

Additional reporting by Jill Colvin.